Barack Obama leads at 95% across 14 outcomes, with $17K traded so far. Prices are live probabilities set by traders on Polymarket, not editorial predictions.
| Outcome | Chance | Price | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barack Obama | 95% | 95¢ | $2K |
| Letitia James | 72% | 72¢ | $2K |
| Elizabeth Warren | 69% | 69¢ | $143 |
| Ilhan Omar | 63% | 63¢ | $1K |
| Kaitlan Collins | 57% | 57¢ | $805 |
| Tucker Carlson | 43% | 43¢ | $2K |
| Marjorie Taylor Greene | 41% | 41¢ | $280 |
| Hasan Piker | 37% | 37¢ | $804 |
| Hillary Clinton | 34% | 34¢ | $919 |
| Benjamin Netanyahu | 14% | 14¢ | $3K |
| Elon Musk | 11% | 11¢ | |
| Vladimir Putin | 3% | 3¢ | $817 |
| Pope Leo XIV | 2% | 2¢ | $2K |
| Xi Jinping | 2% | 2¢ | $281 |
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
All Politics markets on Polymarket →
Track every Polymarket market on the markets page, or see who is trading them on the leaderboard.